Inconsistencies, as they were

If we consider the idea that many cultures and philosophies can co-exist, then it seems natural that a person (given the choice) will choose a “framework” for living their life. ¹

But if many frameworks exist, how does one choose which to follow? For most everyone, our basic morality is a matter of our upbringing and culture (call this our hidden morality). On top of this hidden morality, there are more explicit frameworks, usually based on religious or group ethics. (call this our chosen morality)

To select a chosen morality, one could take the time to understand all the viewpoints and come to a conclusion as to which moral framework will have an affect on society that they prefer. But that seems to be a lot of trouble to me (and most people). As a shortcut, people emulate others in positions they admire.

And when we do extend a critical thought, in place of critiquing the moral axioms in our hidden or chosen moralities, we find it easier to find and critique the inconsistencies in the way which we act on a day to day basis. ²

While incorrect (to debunk paradoxes at the edges of a moral ideology, instead of the core beliefs), it is much easier and seemingly more powerful - we strive for consistency and do much to place paradox out of mind ³

But when is pointing out inconsistency relevant and when is it required? I could spend all day pointing out inconsistencies in my beliefs (and everyone else’s) and nothing would get done.

For many, consistency is as a logical tool to invalidate another’s viewpoint. Consistency is also used as an excuse why a certain rule shouldn’t apply to ourselves (but should to others). Is this a reasonable use of consistency?

From my perspective, the main way in which I might critique another’s behavior is in understanding their integrity. If their actions are consistent with their views, I must allow for that. But if their actions are incongruent with their beliefs, and they fall within the “wrong” of my own moral framework, is it my right or duty to correct their actions and beliefs? Probably not, but at least its better than pointing every little paradox that comes my way.

Notes